Read time: 3 minutes

How does Flowlity compare to traditional APS systems like FuturMaster or AZAP?

Answer:

Flowlity differs in multiple ways:

AI at the Core: Built from the ground up with AI and automation, unlike traditional APS solutions based on manual tuning and linear models.

Modern UX: Simplified, intuitive interface that supports high user adoption vs complex legacy screens.

Agile Deployment: SaaS-based, modular rollouts deliver value in weeks—not the long waterfall projects required by older APS tools.

Continuous Innovation: Flowlity updates frequently with new features, while legacy tools evolve more slowly and require manual upgrades.

‍

Ideal For: Organizations looking for faster ROI, ease of use, and advanced automation in a modern planning environment.

Other FAQs:

How does Flowlity compare to traditional APS systems like FuturMaster or AZAP?

Is it useful if I operate in Make-to-Order (production to order) without stock?

What if my ERP has just been installed?

Does the solution manage supplier calendars or product launch/end-of-life dates?

Does the solution manage supplier calendars or product launch/end-of-life dates?

What is the role of my teams in implementing Flowlity? What internal involvement should I expect?

Is the Flowlity solution suitable for Make-to-Stock (MTS) and Make-to-Order (MTO) environments?

Is Flowlity’s approach to Supply Chain Optimization similar to Lokad’s?

What are the main features of Flowlity to optimize Supply Chain planning?

How does Flowlity manage New Product Introductions (NPIs)?