Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR): The end of an era?

For more than two decades, Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR) has been presented as a reference model for supply chain collaboration. Originally developed in the mid-1990s, CPFR aimed to improve forecast accuracy, inventory management, and service levels by encouraging closer cooperation between distributors and suppliers.

However, supply chains today face a very different reality: increasing volatility, frequent disruptions, and growing complexity. In this context, many companies are questioning whether CPFR can still deliver the expected benefits — or whether its limitations outweigh its promise.

This page summarizes the foundations, objectives, and structural limits of CPFR, based on the findings of our whitepaper CPFR: The End of an Era?

What is CPFR? A definition

CPFR (Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment) is a collaborative supply chain strategy first introduced in 1995 by Walmart, Benchmarking Partners, SAP, and Manugistics. It was primarily adopted by large retailers and their major suppliers .

The principle of CPFR is straightforward:
business partners share demand forecasts, promotion plans, and replenishment information in order to jointly build shared forecasts and supply plans.

Unlike purely internal planning systems, CPFR is designed as an inter-company approach, requiring visibility both upstream and downstream across the supply chain. Its objective is to better align supply and demand, reduce stockouts and overstocks, and improve replenishment efficiency — especially for products with irregular demand such as seasonal items, promotions, or new product launches.

‍

How does CPFR work in practice?

In practice, CPFR relies on a structured collaboration process between commercial partners. Each party agrees to exchange selected planning data — including forecasts, orders, and promotional plans — in order to synchronize decisions.

Historically, CPFR initiatives were often implemented using relatively manual tools. Early deployments frequently involved Excel files exchanged by email, even among large retail organizations, illustrating the operational constraints of the model at the time .

CPFR projects were mainly deployed in retail and consumer goods industries, where understanding end-consumer behavior was critical to improving forecast reliability and supply planning accuracy.

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

Why has CPFR struggled to scale?

Despite its ambitions, CPFR adoption has declined over time. According to a study conducted by the Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) among companies that had implemented CPFR pilots, several structural barriers consistently limited success :

• High cost of implementation (reported by 93% of respondents)
• Significant changes to internal processes (67%)
• Lack of human resources (35%)
• Insufficient experience and training (23%)
• Difficulty scaling CPFR across more products or points of sale (20%)
• Lack of suitable commercial partners (18%)

Beyond cost and complexity, CPFR requires a deep organizational shift. Companies must adopt a “win-win” mindset, standardize data and IT systems, and accept a high level of information sharing. In reality, concerns about data confidentiality and loss of competitive advantage have often slowed or blocked collaboration altogether .

CPFR in a volatile and complex supply chain environment

When CPFR was introduced, supply chains were more stable and less globally interconnected. Today, disruptions are more frequent, and variability is the norm. The whitepaper highlights that modern supply chains experience crises lasting over a month every few years on average, making static and heavy collaboration frameworks increasingly difficult to maintain .

While CPFR aimed to synchronize partners, it often struggled to adapt quickly enough to changing conditions. The reliance on predefined processes, manual coordination, and bilateral data exchanges limited responsiveness in highly volatile environments.

From CPFR to networked supply chains

The decline of CPFR does not mean collaboration has lost its relevance. On the contrary, experts agree that synchronization across supply chain partners remains essential, particularly to reduce phenomena such as the bullwhip effect .

What has changed is the expected maturity level of collaboration. Industry analyses, including Gartner’s supply chain maturity models, show a shift toward extended, networked supply chains where value is created collectively across multiple partners rather than through isolated bilateral collaborations .

In this new model, collaboration relies less on manual data sharing and more on scalable, robust technologies capable of managing uncertainty, protecting sensitive information, and continuously adapting plans.

Is CPFR really “the end of an era”?

CPFR introduced a new level of collaboration between retailers and suppliers by encouraging shared visibility into forecasts, promotions, and supply plans.
But supply chains have evolved: markets are increasingly complex, unpredictable, and volatile, and collaboration now raises major questions around scalability, coordination, and data sharing.

The whitepaper explores what CPFR delivers in practice, where it tends to break down, and what it could be replaced by in today’s environment.

What you will learn in the whitepaper

CPFR: The End of an Era? provides an in-depth, evidence-based analysis of collaborative planning in supply chains, including:

• The original objectives and principles of CPFR
• Why CPFR projects often failed to move beyond pilot phases
• The organizational, technical, and economic limits of CPFR
• How supply chain collaboration is evolving toward network-based models
• Key steps to build a more resilient and mature supply chain in a volatile world